QOTD: What's the least photogenic car?

Kinja'd!!! "mkbruin, Atlas VP" (mkbruin)
08/19/2015 at 09:16 • Filed to: None

Kinja'd!!!4 Kinja'd!!! 25

I love the GTO. I am patiently waiting for them to drop in price, but they are stuck near $15k and not moving, unless you want a rebuilt title. BUT, it took 10 minutes to find the lede pic.

Kinja'd!!!

As badass as the GTO is, and how aggressive the subtleties are in person, it almost always fails to photograph well.

Is there a good car that’s worse to photograph?


DISCUSSION (25)


Kinja'd!!! 04sneaky - Boxers. Blowers. Bikes. And bitches. > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 09:21

Kinja'd!!!0

That’s because it just wants to be a Commodore....


Kinja'd!!! Sir_Stig: and toxic masculinity ruins the party again. > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 09:22

Kinja'd!!!0

I would argue that it’s just a bad looking in person. I think NB Miatas look far better in person, photos don’t do them justice.


Kinja'd!!! pip bip - choose Corrour > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 09:25

Kinja'd!!!0

nothing springs to mind.


Kinja'd!!! WasGTIthenGTOthenNOVAnowbacktoGTI > 04sneaky - Boxers. Blowers. Bikes. And bitches.
08/19/2015 at 09:26

Kinja'd!!!1

That’s because it IS a Commodore.


Kinja'd!!! RazoE > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 09:30

Kinja'd!!!0

Lamborghini Espada. It’s hideous in photos. It’s hideous in real-life, but it’s a gorgeous hideous. I love it.


Kinja'd!!! Supreme Chancellor and Glorious Leader SaveTheIntegras > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 09:38

Kinja'd!!!7

Kinja'd!!!

They look outstanding in person; in a picture they look ‘meh’


Kinja'd!!! Firewrx234 > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 09:39

Kinja'd!!!0

I wanted one of those sooo bad! A dealer near me was wanting $25,995 for one not long ago, yes it only had 25k miles but major cp IMO.


Kinja'd!!! DoYouEvenShift > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 09:44

Kinja'd!!!0

Kinja'd!!!

While Im aware of its capabilities and respect it for them. Its not an attractive car.

Kinja'd!!!

I have nothing against Ford or Mustangs. However the last 10 years have not been the best aestheticly speaking.

PS: These are just my opinions and mean nothing to anbody except myself.


Kinja'd!!! MultiplaOrgasms > WasGTIthenGTOthenNOVAnowbacktoGTI
08/19/2015 at 09:46

Kinja'd!!!1

Indeed it is.

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! wiffleballtony > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 09:52

Kinja'd!!!1

Going to be honest with you, not sure how much more they’ll drop. They’ve been at that price for like 5 years now. Though that price seems silly, but it’s a limited production car for a dead marquee.


Kinja'd!!! wiffleballtony > DoYouEvenShift
08/19/2015 at 09:54

Kinja'd!!!0

Do you prefer the New Edge Mustang?


Kinja'd!!! DoYouEvenShift > wiffleballtony
08/19/2015 at 10:12

Kinja'd!!!0

Kinja'd!!!

Best Mustang, looks wise.


Kinja'd!!! sm70- why not Duesenberg? > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 10:17

Kinja'd!!!1

Most of the current supercars that people criticize as being ugly, boring, etc. (FF, Huracan, S65, and so on) are actually quite stunning in person.


Kinja'd!!! My citroen won't start > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 10:20

Kinja'd!!!0

Kinja'd!!!

This weird little fucker, IRL it looks amazing.


Kinja'd!!! wiffleballtony > DoYouEvenShift
08/19/2015 at 10:22

Kinja'd!!!1

That looks mean. I do like that front valance.


Kinja'd!!! BeaterGT > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 10:42

Kinja'd!!!0

Look for one on big and littles....as it should be.


Kinja'd!!! Nobi > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 10:49

Kinja'd!!!0

I found my ‘04 used at a Toyota dealer with 52k on it for $11,500. They’re out there, you just gotta look. Far as them not being photogenic...

Kinja'd!!!

In the right light

Kinja'd!!!

And in the right color it’s quite handsome. If all else fails...

Kinja'd!!!

Kinja'd!!!

Kinja'd!!!

Just add tire smoke.


Kinja'd!!! TractorPillow > Supreme Chancellor and Glorious Leader SaveTheIntegras
08/19/2015 at 11:14

Kinja'd!!!1

Beat me to it! I start thinking they look awful and then I see one in person and think “man, I’d drive one of those!”


Kinja'd!!! If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 11:23

Kinja'd!!!0

Kinja'd!!!

Audi R8. In pictures it looks like an overgrown TT, but when you see one it’s much wider and lower than in pictures, and exerts this sort of subdued intensity.


Kinja'd!!! LuczOr > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 11:30

Kinja'd!!!0

2010 refresh of the Mazda3. Looks bad in every photo. Looks marginally better in person.

Kinja'd!!!

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! BarryDanger > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 11:40

Kinja'd!!!0

Sold my 06 6spd for $13.5 last spring :(

It was hard to get a good angle of gretchy

Kinja'd!!!

Kinja'd!!!

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! Carbon Fiber Sasquatch > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 12:07

Kinja'd!!!1

I would say the GTO’s siblings fall into this category. The pictures make them look like boring sedans but when you see one in person, it’s clearly an aggressive sporting car.

Kinja'd!!!

Kinja'd!!!

The SS real problem is at that price point, I’m getting a Cadillac...


Kinja'd!!! holdenbacktears > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 14:15

Kinja'd!!!0

There’s no problem as long as you don’t let GM molest the perfectly good looking Monaro with it’s heinously ugly interpretation of a modern Pontiac front end

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! holdenbacktears > mkbruin, Atlas VP
08/19/2015 at 14:17

Kinja'd!!!0

Kinja'd!!!

The did the same thing to the poor VE SS commodore with the G8 as well

.


Kinja'd!!! Mark - Sixpots None The Richer > mkbruin, Atlas VP
10/17/2015 at 11:14

Kinja'd!!!0

Kinja'd!!!

Kinja'd!!!

The Scirocco’s design doesn’t work for me at all in pictures, so I wasn’t excited when it was revealed.

But when I saw one in the wild for the first time my opinion changed. It looks fantastic - especially if you keep in mind that they virtually started with a Golf.